University of Otago

Science Academy Blog

Te Kohanga Pūtaiao

Categories

Archives

Tags

ASC2017 Biology Capacitor Chemistry Circuits classroom Climate climate change communication competition Curriculum DNA Electricity evolution exams Experiment experiments fossil general genetics hominid KF kitchen science maths mutation Physics Protein research Resonance resource resources revision science Science Communication science festival sleep solar power Speciation Standing Waves statistics stress students study teachers teaching
  • Science Academy Website

Blog Search

Be social

Follow us on Facebook Subscribe to our RSS feed Follow us on Twitter

RSS NZ Science Media Centre

  • Public land up for sale under the Conservation Amendment Bill – Expert Reaction
  • Should we worry about bottom trawling? – Expert Q&A
  • Gene-edited crops approved in Europe – Expert Reaction
  • Winners of 2026 Science Journalism Awards announced
  • Wellington’s seaside flooding outpaces global average – Expert Reaction

RSS New Scientist News

Recent Comments

  • Ashton Bradley on Let there be light!!!
  • EMILY HALL on I had to get up anyway…
  • jonta922 on Excellent Revision Site for Chemistry, Physics & Biology!
  • jonta922 on Y13 Biology Plant and Animal Responses to the Environment

» Home >

Tag Archives: public engagement

The crowd goes wild…

Monday, March 13th, 2017 | EMILY HALL | No Comments

Poster for the 2016 show. The picture is the 2015 Physics group explaining the Physics of Flight.

In July, our current OUASSA student cohort will present short public science shows at the Otago Museum. This is the third year of students to undertake a public show. At the moment, the students are working on their topics and themes (as per last week’s blog post). In developing these though, there has been some chat in their presentation groups online about the audience.

Who is the audience for a public science show? We’ve told the students that it can be anyone from adults to children, people with PhDs in the topic they are talking about (we are at a University after all!) but equally likely people who know nothing about the topic.

 

We can do a little better than these generalisations though if we look at who is most likely to attend these shows. The general public can be very broad, but it is likely that we will not have a true general public audience but rather a subset.

At the ASC Conference, one of the speakers gave an excellent talk about this very topic. From my notes on the talk, the general public can be roughly divided into 4 groups when it comes to Science Communication:

  1. The Science Fans – the lovers of Science who can’t get enough and invest their free time in reading, attending talks, museums and other science related activities
  2. The Cautiously Keen – they aren’t the fanboys or fangirls but they have a genuine interest in science and are keen to know more.
  3. The risk averse – not engaged
  4. The concerned – not engaged

At another session, a speaker who was arranging events based on Astronomy found that the people who came to the astronomy outreach events were generally young, University educated adults. At the Otago Museum, where the student event will be held, we know that they get a lot of young families coming through the door, parents who fit into one of those first two categories bringing their children to hopefully pass on their love of science or sometimes, children who fit into one of those categories bringing along an open minded parent.

So what does this mean for the students who are working on their shows? I think the first thing to remember is that the people who come to the show will most likely be from those first two groups, they will either be science fans or cautiously keen. This means they will already be open to what the students will be presenting and interested. Interested enough to give up an afternoon and maybe even bring the family along. So we can reasonably count on a friendly audience.

They’ve come in the door friendly and interested. Now what? People in general are funny creatures. They tend to work on emotion and intuition rather than facts. Think about a teacher that you had that you really feel like you learned from. Did you like them? Relationships are very important in communicating a message. The audience has to trust you, trust that you have their best interests at heart and relate to you enough to want to hear what you have to say. That connection with the audience at a personal level is more important that being seen as an expert. Students are often worried that they don’t know enough depth in their topic to be on stage telling the public about it. Knowledge is definitely important, but I would argue that it is more important that they come across to the audience as trustworthy, relate-able and passionate.

More notes from the ASC conference: an engaging outreach activity will:

  1. Validate the audience’s thinking
  2. Take them on a journey
  3. Be framed within their values
  4. Fall within social norms
  5. Involve pictures and graphs (and I would add audience participation!)

A 10 minute student public talk is not the time or place to be confronting, controversial, or push a view on a particular issue. The aim is to have the audience leave happy and hopefully having learned something. Very often when students begin their Science communication journey, they subscribe to a deficient model of thinking. The public doesn’t know about X and it is my job to make them understand and accept it. Instead, knowing that the audience is most likely already engaged in some way, with these talks, the focus should be on giving the public enough of a glimpse of the topic that they go away wanting more.

So hopefully that helps a wee bit with the preparation of the public shows. The audience doesn’t expect you to know everything, they expect you to show them something they don’t know or show it to them in a new way. Your enthusiasm and interest in the topic will go a long way to making the audience want to engage in your show and take that journey with you.

Posted in General, Science Communication | Tagged 2017, ASC2017, July, public engagement, student presentations | Leave a reply

Archives

  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • March 2023
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • July 2021
  • April 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • October 2016
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • January 2011

Meta

  • Log in
 
 
 

Any views or opinion represented in this site belong solely to the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the University of Otago. Any view or opinion represented in the comments are personal and are those of the respective commentator/contributor to this site.