{"id":122,"date":"2014-08-28T10:27:54","date_gmt":"2014-08-27T22:27:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/?p=122"},"modified":"2014-08-28T10:30:31","modified_gmt":"2014-08-27T22:30:31","slug":"recent-te-tumu-theses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/recent-te-tumu-theses\/","title":{"rendered":"Recent Te Tumu theses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Te Tumu had a number of its students\u00a0honoured at the university&#8217;s recent Graduation, including several doing post-graduate research.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_123\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/sam.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-123\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-123\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/sam-300x225.png\" alt=\"Sam Jackson\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/sam-300x225.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/sam-399x300.png 399w, https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/sam.png 634w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-123\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Sam Jackson<\/p><\/div>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><strong>Samantha Jackson<\/strong><\/span>, &#8220;Ko Te Houhanga a Rongo marae t\u014dku t\u016brangawaewae: In search of a philosophical standing place for indigenous development&#8221;, (MA Indigenous Development).<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><em>Supervisors<\/em><\/span>: Professor Grant Gillett, Associate Professor Merata Kawharu, Dr. Paerau Warbrick<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><em>Abstract<\/em><\/span>: Dominant paradigms of development assume a linear progression from one established point to another. These paradigms do not take into account the complexity of indigenous voice, spirit and ways of being-in-the-world, leaving indigenous peoples without a meaningful place to stand. To approach the question of indigenous development in such a straight forward manner is a methodological error which stands to obscure meaningful indigenous development and silence the indigenous spirit.<\/p>\n<p>In order to appropriately investigate the question of indigenous development, I argue we must awaken ourselves to our assumptions which form the background of how we view and understand ourselves, the world and others. I draw on Martin Heidegger\u2019s interrogation of Cartesian thought to provide a space through which indigenous development can be meaningfully approached from a tangata whenua (M\u0101ori, people of the land) philosophical perspective.<\/p>\n<p>I utilise the traditions and teachings of Reverend M\u0101ori Marsden to posit a meaningful model of indigenous development must be rooted in Te Ao M\u0101rama traditions (M\u0101ori worldview), a woven universe of connection between self, ancestors, universe and gods. This idea is mooted in an international indigenous context, before returning to the traditions pertaining to Te Houhanga a Rongo marae (M\u0101ori cultural complex), my own t\u016brangawaewae (place to stand). I argue marae are a manifestation of Te Ao M\u0101rama worldview and therefore an appropriate site to investigate indigenous development. I utilise whakapapa (genealogy) and k\u014drero p\u016br\u0101kau (stories of origin) as important mechanisms through which one can come to understand and organise the relationship between a person, their world and their gods. Maintaining an intimate relationship within the woven universe validates a person\u2019s t\u016brangawaewae giving them the \u2018sureness of touch\u2019 of a person firmly rooted in belonging with unlimited potential for human development.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_126\" style=\"width: 210px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/nicole.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-126\" class=\"wp-image-126 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/nicole-200x300.png\" alt=\"nicole\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/nicole-200x300.png 200w, https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/nicole-682x1024.png 682w, https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/files\/2014\/08\/nicole.png 865w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-126\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Nicole McCrossin<\/p><\/div>\n<p><span class=\"Apple-style-span\" style=\"font-weight: normal;color: #000000\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><strong>Nicole McCrossin,<\/strong><\/span> &#8220;<\/span>Intention and Implementation: Piecing Together Provisions for M\u0101ori in the Resource Management Act 1991&#8243;, (MA, Indigenous Development)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><em>Supervisors<\/em><\/span>:\u00a0Dr Janet Stephenson and Dr Jenny Bryant-Tokalau<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000\"><em>Abstract<\/em><\/span>:<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>Today, it is widely recognised that indigenous people have a valuable contribution to make to the development and practice of resource management. New Zealand legislation recognises in part the importance of M\u0101ori participation; however, there appears to be a considerable gap between the recognition of these rights and their effective and widespread implementation at ground level. This study explores the intentions behind, and the implementation of Section 33 transfers of power and Sections 36B-E joint management agreements, under the Resource Management Act 1991, which support M\u0101ori participation in resource management decision-making. These provide for the devolution of power from local authorities to iwi authorities and the establishment of agreements to co-manage resources with iwi. A nationwide survey of local authorities\u2019 use of the provisions demonstrated that they had been virtually unused. The majority of local authorities do not have any form of co-management agreements with M\u0101ori, and those that do have quite constrained arrangements which are designed to enhance consultation, rather than shared decision-making. The results of the survey are contrasted to findings from a series of semi-structured interviews with key informants involved in the crafting of the RMA, which examines the intentions\u00a0behind the inclusion of these mechanisms in the legislation. The concept of institutional bricolage is used to help explain their creation and implementation, and the subsequent negotiation of the mechanisms and their alternatives by councils. The survey and interview results revealed that an intentional institutional bricolage approach was frequently employed by councils and iwi to negotiate co-management arrangements, but was not used in the crafting of the RMA co-management provisions. Instead, the provisions were a result of unintentional institutional bricolage, drawing on a range of structural and social influences.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Te Tumu had a number of its students\u00a0honoured at the university&#8217;s recent Graduation, including several doing post-graduate research. Samantha Jackson, &#8220;Ko Te Houhanga a Rongo marae t\u014dku t\u016brangawaewae: In search of a philosophical standing place for indigenous development&#8221;, (MA Indigenous [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":15374,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[35260,354,35249],"tags":[35293,35287,45149,35288,35291,35292,35289,35290],"class_list":["post-122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-indigenous-development","category-postgraduate","category-success-story","tag-consultation","tag-identity","tag-indigenous-development","tag-marae","tag-resource-management-act","tag-rma","tag-turangawaewae","tag-whakapapa"],"post_mailing_queue_ids":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15374"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/tetumuresearch\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}