What will it take to get to under 5% smoking prevalence 2025? Lots of cessation.

Posted on by

Professor Tony Blakely

Professor Tony Blakely and Assoc Professor Nick Wilson

The New Zealand Government has a goal of a Smokefree Nation by 2025, often interpreted as a smoking prevalence of less than 5% by 2025.    This should be a major focus of the New Zealand contingent at the Smokefree Oceania Conference in Auckland next week.  But what would it take in the way of reductions in uptake (or initiation), and/or increases in cessation rates, to achieve this goal?

We try to answer this question in a paper just published in the international journal Tobacco Control, led by Tak Ikeda and a presentation that he will also give at the conference next week.  The answer differs by ethnicity.  Essentially, 10% of non-Māori smokers need to quit each year to achieve 5% smoking prevalence by 2025 for non-Māori.  And 20% for Māori.  We concluded that changes in initiation rates are not as important as changes in cessation rates to achieve the 2025 goal.

These are large increases in net cessation rates over and above what we have seen in the last decade, especially for Māori.

Can we do it? We think so, if the political will to help smokers quit is sustained.

So what did we do in this paper just published?  First, we worked out what the cessation rates and initiation rates in recent decades must have been to ‘produce’ the observed smoking prevalence rates in Census and Health Survey data.  We then used these BAU (business as usual) estimates to project out what the tobacco smoking prevalence will be in the future – the black lines in the figures below.  Bad news: under BAU non-Māori smoking prevalence would only get to 10% by 2025, and Māori prevalence to a disappointing 35%.  (More text below this large figure.)

Second, we changed either or both the initiation (i.e. prevalence among 20 year olds) and cessation rates, and projected future prevalence.  As stated above, initiation does not really matter too much.  So focus instead on the cessation rates.  The green lines are for 5% annual cessation rates: gets us to about 13% for non-Māori, but only about 20% to 25% for Māori.

The blue lines (10% cessation rates) get us there for non-Māori, but only get us to 15% to 20% for Māori.  We need the pink lines (20% annual cessation rates) to get us there for Māori. That is, each year 20% of all Māori smokers will need to successfully quit.  (Which is a bit like reverse compound interest as shown by the curved lines.)

So, the task is large.  And it is this level of cessation that we require.  So if someone advocates an intervention that reduces initiation by a couple of percentage points, or increases the marginal quit rate from 10% to (say) 11% after six months, this is only going to be a small part of the solution!  Interventions to achieve the 2025 goal must be population-wide, far reaching, and markedly drive up cessation

How can we do it? One possibility comes from work from the BODE3 Programme that will be presented by Nick Wilson at the Smokefree Oceania Conference. It suggests that ongoing tobacco tax increases as per recent years could get non-Māori to the 2025 goal – but even larger increases in tax would be needed for Māori.  Conversely, work that will be presented by Amber Pearson suggests that (major) reductions in retail outlets will not be enough, in and of themselves.  Although restrictions on retail outlets may help with both ongoing denormalisation, and may be a necessary step in the final stages of the endgame. Even increased use of e-cigarettes to help with quitting might contribute to progress, but we suspect that the value of these new products is not as great as might be hoped (see a previous Blog in Public Health Expert).

Whatever mix of major strategies is used – New Zealand society probably needs much more action at all levels: political leadership, strong NGO advocacy and health professionals providing encouragement and support to smokers.

.

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by TONY BLAKELY. Bookmark the permalink.

About TONY BLAKELY

I am an epidemiologist and public health researcher. My research activities span mortality studies, health inequalities, healthy eating, tobacco and cancer control. I teach advanced epidemiology methods. I currently direct the Burden of Disease Epidemiology, Equity and Cost effectiveness programme (BODE3) where we are modelling the health impact, cost and cost effectiveness of preventive and cancer control interventions.

3 thoughts on “What will it take to get to under 5% smoking prevalence 2025? Lots of cessation.

  1. The task IS large. It is also very large task for many smokers to achieve their goal of breaking the habit. It seems to me that we need a comprehensive approach to achieve this national target and for individuals to acheive thier pesonal target. Those who are attempting to quit (and we do want to encourage them!) can benefit greatly from reasonably-priced access to a range of different products and services to aid their attempt – and let’s keep in mind that most long-time (addicted) smokers experience numerous relapses, sometimes years apart. Some cessation products are poorly suited to some would-be ex-smokers whilst being highly suited to others. Champix is but one example, where some manage to stop smoking (at least for a time) whilst others crumple into depression and are terrified to make a further attempt. Having plenty of options to help in the attempt to quit is really important in addition to the ‘large’ ideas such as big tax increases and limiting tobacco supply – which I fully support.
    FYI: I haven’t had a single puff of a single cigarette since September 2001, but I do not yet have the courage to label myself an ‘ex-smoker’. I will always be addicted to nicotine and in the past, telling myself I’m an ex-smoker has mentally ‘given me permission’ to have ‘just one’, leading to a seemingly inevitable relapse. So in my mind I’m still a smoker – albeit that I haven’t indulged for 12 years after 30 years of smoking (having started at age 10), interspersed with about a dozen serious attempts to quit.

    • Hi Carolyn,

      I concur that options for smokers looking to quit must be provided (although whether e-cigarettes and snus are part of that range is a moot point). Together with population-wide interventions such as tax and denormalisation, this may get us to the 2025 goal – but it will require concerted action.

      Tony

      • Ex Carolyn Hooper “Some cessation products are poorly suited to some would-be ex-smokers whilst being highly suited to others”. It isn’t just the provision of options but more so the need to match the best option to the smoker. Has there been any work done on this or has it largely been trial and error to this point?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* *