{"id":872,"date":"2011-02-21T09:00:23","date_gmt":"2011-02-20T21:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/?p=872"},"modified":"2012-09-25T02:06:45","modified_gmt":"2012-09-24T14:06:45","slug":"locke%e2%80%99s-master-builders-were-experimental-philosophers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/locke%e2%80%99s-master-builders-were-experimental-philosophers\/","title":{"rendered":"Locke\u2019s Master-Builders were Experimental Philosophers"},"content":{"rendered":"

Peter Anstey says…<\/strong><\/p>\n

In one of the great statements of philosophical humility the English philosopher John Locke characterised his aims for the Essay concerning Human Understanding<\/em> (1690) in the following terms:<\/p>\n

    The Commonwealth of Learning, is not at this time without Master-Builders, whose mighty Designs, in advancing the Sciences, will leave lasting Monuments to the Admiration of Posterity; But every one must not hope to be a Boyle, or a Sydenham; and in an age that produces such Masters, as the Great \u2013 Huygenius, and the incomparable Mr. Newton, with some other of that Strain; \u2019tis Ambition enough to be employed as an Under-Labourer in clearing Ground a little, and removing some of the Rubbish, that lies in the way to Knowledge (Essay<\/em>, \u2018Epistle to the Reader\u2019).<\/ol>\n

    Locke regarded his project as the work of an under-labourer, sweeping away rubbish so that the \u2018big guns\u2019 could continue their work. But what is it that unites Boyle, Sydenham, Huygens and Newton as Master-Builders? It can\u2019t be the fact that they are all British, because Huygens was Dutch. It can\u2019t be the fact that they were all friends of Locke, for when Locke penned these words he almost certainly had not even met Isaac Newton. Nor can it be the fact that they were all eminent natural philosophers, after all, Thomas Sydenham was a physician.<\/p>\n

    In my book John Locke and Natural Philosophy<\/em><\/a>, I contend that what they had in common was that they all were proponents or practitioners of the new experimental philosophy and that it was this that led Locke to group them together. In the case of Boyle, the situation is straightforward: he was the experimental philosopher par excellence<\/em>. In the case of Newton, Locke had recently reviewed his Principia<\/em> and mentions this \u2018incomparable book\u2019, endorsing its method in later editions of the Essay<\/em> itself. Interestingly, in his review Locke focuses on Newton\u2019s arguments against Descartes\u2019 vortex theory of planetary motions, which had come to be regarded as an archetypal form of speculative philosophy.<\/p>\n

    In the case of Huygens, little is known of his relations with Locke, but he was a promoter of the method of natural history and he remained the leading experimental natural philosopher in the Parisian Acad\u00e9mie<\/em>. In the case of Sydenham, it was his methodology that Locke admired and, especially those features of his method that were characteristic of the experimental philosophy. Here is what Locke says of Sydenham\u2019s method to Thomas Molyneux:<\/p>\n

      I hope the age has many who will follow [Sydenham\u2019s] example, and by the way of accurate practical observation, as he has so happily begun, enlarge the history of diseases, and improve the art of physick, and not by speculative hypotheses fill the world with useless, tho\u2019 pleasing visions (1 Nov. 1692, Correspondence<\/em>, 4, p. 563).<\/ol>\n

      Note the references to \u2018accurate practical observation\u2019, the decrying of \u2018speculative hypotheses\u2019 and the endorsement of the natural \u2018history of diseases\u2019 \u2013 all leading doctrines of the experimental philosophy in the late seventeenth century. So, even though Sydenham was a physician, he could still practise medicine according to the new method of the experimental philosophy. In fact, many in Locke\u2019s day regarded natural philosophy and medicine as forming a seamless whole in so far as they shared a common method. It should be hardly surprising to find that Locke held this view, for he too was a physician.<\/p>\n

      If it is this common methodology that unites Locke\u2019s four heroes then we are entitled to say \u2018Locke\u2019s Master-Builders were experimental philosophers\u2019. I challenge readers to come up with a better explanation of Locke’s choice of these four Master-Builders.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Peter Anstey says… In one of the great statements of philosophical humility the English philosopher John Locke characterised his aims for the Essay concerning Human Understanding (1690) in the following terms: The Commonwealth of Learning, is not at this time […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":56,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[113],"tags":[368,226,370,366,367,224,369],"class_list":["post-872","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ideas","tag-boyle","tag-experimental-philosophy","tag-huygens","tag-locke","tag-master-builders","tag-newton","tag-sydenham"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/872","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/56"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=872"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/872\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=872"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=872"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=872"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}