{"id":4125,"date":"2016-09-08T16:44:36","date_gmt":"2016-09-08T04:44:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/?p=4125"},"modified":"2016-09-07T22:07:11","modified_gmt":"2016-09-07T10:07:11","slug":"the-ambiguous-status-of-maupertuis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/the-ambiguous-status-of-maupertuis\/","title":{"rendered":"The ambiguous status of Maupertuis"},"content":{"rendered":"

Peter Anstey writes…<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis (1698\u20131759) was one of the leading and most celebrated French natural philosophers of the eighteenth century. A competent mathematician who studied with Johann I Bernoulli, a foreign member of the Royal Society, a member of the Parisian Acad\u00e9mie royale des Sciences and, from 1746, the perpetual President of the Berlin Acad\u00e9mie des sciences et belles lettres, Maupertuis was one of the premier savants of his age. But, was Maupertuis an experimental philosopher?<\/p>\n

There is no doubt that his greatest achievement was the Lapland expedition to determine the length of a degree of longitude near the North Pole and to settle once and for all the debate over the shape of the Earth. Maupertuis\u2019 observations, in spite of challenges from the astronomer Cassini, proved decisive and the Newtonian theory that the Earth is an oblate spheroid, bulging at the Equator, was finally accepted. The expedition involved all the elements of experimental natural philosophy: instruments, teamwork, careful observations, measurement, analysis, experimental reports, etc.<\/p>\n

The expedition took place from May 1736 to August 1737, just at the time when experimental philosophy was being enthusiastically embraced in France through the influence of Nollet, Voltaire and others. On the expedition Maupertuis was accompanied by the young Pierre Charles Le Monnier, who five years later dedicated his translation of Roger Cotes\u2019 lectures on experimental philosophy to him. It is entitled Le\u00e7ons de physique exp\u00e9rimentale<\/em> <\/a>(Paris, 1742) and in the dedicatory epistle Le Monnier says of Maupertuis, \u2018no one can ignore how many discoveries you have enriched natural philosophy with\u2019.<\/p>\n

It is tempting, therefore, to regard Maupertuis as having vindicated Newtonian experimental philosophy over and above the speculative Cartesians and to see him as a beacon for the new methodology that gives priority to experiment and observation over premature theorizing. Who would better qualify to be a leading experimental philosopher in France? However tempting this may be, we should resist it, for, as J. B. Shank intimates (The Newton Wars<\/em>, Chicago, p. 429), Maupertuis seems never to have expressed any enthusiasm about experimental philosophy. Moreover, from the 1740s his intellectual trajectory seems to take him in the opposite direction.<\/p>\n

No doubt one of the motivations for Frederick the Great to invite Maupertuis to Berlin to head up the revivified Academy there in 1746 was to secure the services of a leading and mathematically competent experimental philosopher whose Lapland expedition was now a cause c\u00e9l\u00e8bre <\/em>throughout Europe. The new structure of the Acad\u00e9mie, as we have noted before on this blog<\/a>, consisted of four classes: Experimental Philosophy, Speculative Philosophy, Mathematics and Belles-lettres. Each member of the Academy, apart from the President, belonged to one of these classes, and the bulk of the work of the Academy was published in one of the four sections of the Memoirs that matched the classes.<\/p>\n

Surprisingly, a careful survey of Maupertuis\u2019 contributions to the main publication of the Berlin Academy, the Histoire de l\u2019acad\u00e9mie royale des sciences et belles lettres<\/em> reveals that, in spite of his scientific achievements, Maupertuis didn\u2019t publish a single article in the Experimental Philosophy memoirs. Nor did he publish anything in the Mathematics section. His account of his famous Principle of Least Action, entitled \u2018The laws of motion and of rest deduced from a metaphysical principle\u2019, appears in the 1748 memoirs for speculative philosophy. Likewise, his \u2018The different ways by which men have expressed their ideas\u2019 and his \u2018Philosophical examination of the proof of the existence of God\u2019 also appeared in the Speculative Philosophy section in 1756 and 1758 respectively. His \u2018On the manner of writing and reading the lives of great men\u2019 appeared in Belles-lettres in 1757. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence that he ever performed an experiment after arriving in Berlin in 1746.<\/p>\n

An adequate explanation of this ambiguous status of Maupertuis vis-\u00e0-vis experimental philosophy is likely to be complicated. It would have to reach back to some of his earliest papers in natural philosophy, such as \u2018On the laws of attraction\u2019 published in 1735, for this includes a metaphysical section on God and the inverse square law (Histoire de l’acad\u00e9mie royale des sciences<\/em>, 1735, pp. 343\u201362). It would also have to explore the influence of Leibniz and Wolff on both Maupertuis and others in the Berlin Academy, such as its secretary Samuel Formey. For example, the influence of Leibniz and Wolff may account for the absence of any tension between experimental and speculative philosophy in the Berlin Academy. Clearly the case of Maupertuis requires further reflection. We are very keen to hear from anyone who has thoughts on these matters.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Peter Anstey writes… Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis (1698\u20131759) was one of the leading and most celebrated French natural philosophers of the eighteenth century. A competent mathematician who studied with Johann I Bernoulli, a foreign member of the Royal Society, a […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":29807,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[113],"tags":[16454,16456,16455,4402,16437,16457],"class_list":["post-4125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ideas","tag-berlin-academie","tag-formey","tag-lapland-expedition","tag-leibniz","tag-maupertuis","tag-principle-of-least-action"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/29807"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4125"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4125\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}