{"id":4046,"date":"2016-04-12T12:01:02","date_gmt":"2016-04-12T00:01:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/?p=4046"},"modified":"2016-04-12T12:01:02","modified_gmt":"2016-04-12T00:01:02","slug":"cfp-feeding-on-the-nectar-of-the-gods-appropriations-of-isaac-newtons-thought-ca-1700-1750","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/cfp-feeding-on-the-nectar-of-the-gods-appropriations-of-isaac-newtons-thought-ca-1700-1750\/","title":{"rendered":"CFP: &#8216;Feeding on the nectar of the gods&#8217;: Appropriations of Isaac Newton&#8217;s thought, ca. 1700-1750"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2 style=\"text-align: left\">CFP: &#8216;Feeding on the nectar of the gods&#8217;: Appropriations of Isaac Newton&#8217;s thought, ca. 1700-1750<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 5-6 July 2016<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\n<strong>University Foundation<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> Egmontstraat 11 Rue d&#8217;Egmont<\/strong><br \/>\n<strong> B-1000 Brussels, Belgium<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The conference theme is the diffusion of Newton&#8217;s thought during the first half of the eighteenth century across Europe. The seeming ease with which Newton&#8217;s ideas were diffused has long been described as self-evident. State-of-the-art research has, however, shown that the spread and success of Newton&#8217;s corpus was far from obvious. More particularly, it has been suggested that the successful diffusion of Newton&#8217;s ideas was not merely determined by the obvious merits of the scientific claims which Newton developed in his two major works, the <em>Principia<\/em> (first edition: 1687) and the <em>Opticks<\/em> (first edition: 1704), but also by local factors and contexts, such as inter alia: (a) already established scholarly and educationally dominant traditions or systems; (b) theological and religious fractions, sensibilities, and worldviews; and (c) metaphysical and methodological orientations. Seen from this perspective, if we want to fully understand the successful spread of Newton&#8217;s ideas, we need to take into account the multifarious ways in which his ideas were appropriated in order to meet local &#8216;needs&#8217;. At the same time, we need to pinpoint the characteristics of those very ideas in virtue of which they could be successfully &#8216;exported&#8217; to different intellectual and scientific hubs across Europe. The scientific committee welcomes presentations that contribute to our understanding of the spread of Newton&#8217;s thought across Europe from approximately 1700 to 1750.<\/p>\n<p>Abstracts of approximately 500 words should be sent to the conference chair Prof. Dr. <a href=\"mailto:steffen.ducheyne@vub.ac.be\">Steffen Ducheyne<\/a> by 24 April 2016. Decisions will be made shortly thereafter. There will be room for 12 contributed presentations (20-22 minutes for the actual presentation + 10-8 minutes for Q&amp;A). Abstracts will be evaluated anonymously by the scientific committee according to the following criteria: 1. quality, 2. relevance to the conference theme, and 3. capacity to engender a diverse coverage of the diffusion of Newton&#8217;s thought.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Keynote Speakers<\/strong><br \/>\nMarta Cavazza (Universita di Bologna)<br \/>\nTamas Demeter (Hungarian Academy of Science)<br \/>\nSteffen Ducheyne (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)<br \/>\nMordechai Feingold (Caltech)<br \/>\nNiccolo Guicciardini (Universita degli Studi di Bergamo)*<br \/>\nRob Iliffe (University of Oxford)<br \/>\nScott Mandelbrote (University of Cambridge)<br \/>\nStephen D. Snobelen (University of King&#8217;s College)<\/p>\n<p>* Lecture sponsored by Belgian Society for Logic and Philosophy of Science.<\/p>\n<p>More information <a href=\"http:\/\/www.vub.ac.be\/CLWF\/activities\/newton2016.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>CFP: &#8216;Feeding on the nectar of the gods&#8217;: Appropriations of Isaac Newton&#8217;s thought, ca. 1700-1750 Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 5-6 July 2016 University Foundation Egmontstraat 11 Rue d&#8217;Egmont B-1000 Brussels, Belgium The conference theme [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4582,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[55],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4046","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4046","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4582"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4046"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4046\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4046"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4046"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.otago.ac.nz\/emxphi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4046"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}